By [Vigilante]
Real Deep web Contributor
In a world where email—the oldest of our digital tools—still carries so much of our personal, commercial and civic life, privacy has stopped being a courtesy and become a security requirement. On that board, a relatively new name, Mailum, is gaining traction in specialist forums and security communities: a radical proposal that aims to encrypt not only the obvious (the message body), but also what most providers leave exposed: the subject line, sender, recipient and metadata. For activists under scrutiny, journalists with sensitive sources, or ordinary citizens tired of commercial surveillance, that nuance can make all the difference.
A Twist of the Screw: Encrypting What Almost No One Encrypts
Mailum’s central promise is easy to state and ambitious in technical scope: to lock down the four parts of an email and its metadata, not just the content. The service’s own documentation and blog hammer that point home—often setting it against the industry’s prevailing practices.
To understand the stakes, it helps to contrast with the de facto standard: Proton Mail, a pioneer in bringing end-to-end encryption to the mainstream, does not end-to-end encrypt the subject line (or certain other headers), for interoperability reasons tied to OpenPGP. Proton’s support materials say as much: the raw material that lets servers route mail remains unprotected under those standards. The practical outcome: even if the content is sealed, the who, when and what it’s about remain more exposed.
Mailum plants its flag precisely there. Its materials repeat that its “full encryption” covers those sensitive elements; independent reviews go in the same direction and add that the user experience doesn’t suffer for it: composing, sending and reading feels familiar, only under a stricter cryptographic vault.
The Onion Layer: Tor Access to Evade Prying Eyes and Blocks
For those connecting from censored countries or under interception threats, the most discreet path is Tor. Mailum maintains a .onion address—publicly confirmed in its technical presence—that lets you enter your inbox without revealing your real IP and without making it obvious to your internet provider which service you’re accessing. That address is:
http://mailum3h3jwoeptq7p6wxoigqvc4m25kujxfybu7mud3uxkmebnphmad.onion
It appears both in the team’s public footprint and in reputable external directories that verify Tor-hosted services.
It isn’t unusual for a serious provider to offer a .onion gateway: Proton maintains one, too, to cope with high-risk contexts and evade blocks. The difference, in Mailum’s own framing, is that Tor is not an add-on, but part of an “operational anonymity” mindset—a default route when circumstances warrant it.
A Business Model That Doesn’t Feed on Your Data
Another reason Mailum is seducing privacy hawks is its business model. Mailum doesn’t run ads or third-party trackers and offers paid plans at unusually low prices, with the option to pay anonymously using cryptocurrencies (through well-known processors). One technical review pegs the basic plan at roughly $1.40/month (with an annual commitment) and notes that more than 50 cryptocurrencies are accepted. In practical terms: the service’s incentives align with the user who pays for privacy, not the advertiser who monetizes profiles.
A reality check is in order: Mailum also allows you to create a “free forever” account, as stated on its site and in its Google Play listing; but the product’s messaging and structure clearly lean into subscriptions—no ads, no data marketplaces—as the revenue engine. That model is, by itself, a reasonable assurance you won’t “pay” with metadata.
Good Encryption Trades Away Some Convenience (and That’s Fine)
Encrypting subjects, headers and metadata isn’t a flourish. In 2025, data-mining often starts—and just as often ends—in those fields. Do you lose something by choosing such strict encryption? Historically, yes: universal search can be less “magical” when the server can’t see anything; and compatibility with the broader email ecosystem demands careful engineering. Advocates of Mailum’s posture are blunt: that friction is the price of genuine confidentiality. The contrast with Proton’s more interoperable approach—by design, no end-to-end encryption for the subject and certain headers under OpenPGP—illustrates a basic truth: there are no free lunches. Choosing total privacy means accepting trade-offs.
2FA and “Zero Access”: Keeping the Master Key Off the Server
Security doesn’t end with message encryption. Mailum enables two-factor authentication (2FA) with OTP apps and uses a “zero-access” scheme: if you lose your key and don’t keep the “Secret Token” file, the account can be recovered, but older messages are destroyed—better to lose the archive than hand it to an intruder. It’s the logic of a provider that prefers not to be able to help you rather than keeping master keys to the vault.
A Public Trail and Technical Footprint
In a space rich with promises and poor in audits, the public trail matters. Mailum maintains open-source code and technical notes. The organization’s repositories—originally hosted in Poland—include frontend, mobile clients and backend components under open licenses. As of mid-August 2025, the organization shows as “archived” (which doesn’t necessarily mean the service is closed, but that the particular repository is no longer updated)—a data point that, far from disqualifying, invites the due diligence any high-threat-model user should exercise: seek clarity about production versions, active commits and where signed binaries currently live.
What Does It Feel Like to Use?
On the surface, it behaves like a modern webmail: compose, attach, send. The value sits behind the curtain. Native PGP for those already using keys, Tor support for those who need network opacity, and a no-ads/no-trackers stance according to reviewers who have lived with the service for months. For mobile users, there’s an Android app—and the Play Store listing details support, a registered address in Wrocław (Poland), and data policies. The picture suggests a team betting on verifiable public presence in official app stores.
Proton, the Benchmark: Undeniable Strengths—and a Crucial Difference
None of the above diminishes Proton’s merits. Its encrypted suite—mail, calendar, storage—and .onion access have raised the bar for years. Its operational robustness and ecosystem still make it the mass-market reference. But the technical difference that matters here—the inability to end-to-end encrypt the subject and certain headers under OpenPGP—remains, by design. For most people, encrypting the content is enough; for those who want to minimize the “social graph” exposed by headers, Mailum’s proposition is compelling.
The Tor Factor: Operational Anonymity, Not Just Encryption
In high-risk environments—a university network running deep-packet inspection, a country with layer-7 filtering, or a hostile operator—content encryption doesn’t prevent observers from seeing where you’re connecting. That’s where a .onion presence becomes political as much as technical: it not only hides content, it camouflages destination. Publishing and maintaining a first-class Tor gateway extends the user’s security perimeter without forcing them onto ad-hoc “bridges” or corporate proxies with broad attack surfaces.
You Pay for What You Don’t See
Veterans of this industry know “free” is rarely neutral. An inbox financed by ads or by external analytics has incentives to look (or to let others look). Technical write-ups note that Mailum eschews ads and big data-harvesting integrations—which, in effect, reduces the temptation to monetize your exhaust. The option to pay anonymously fits that logic: align incentives so that you are the customer, not the behavioral aggregators.
Transparency, Audits and Necessary Caution
A 2025-era caveat is essential: trust isn’t something you outsource. Mailum publishes guides, keeps a blog, and—again—has opened code. Even so, the brand is young, and its track record of third-party security audits isn’t as documented as veteran providers’. The team’s own messaging underscores that auditing, accepting reports and patching are keys to hygiene in any encrypted service. For organizations where life and liberty ride on every email thread, demanding independent reviews should be the natural next step.
Is It “the Best” for Those Who Demand Total Privacy?
“Best” is a dangerous word in security: everything depends on your threat model. If your concerns are ad-monetization, metadata exposure and network traceability, then the combination of header encryption + .onion access + tracker-free payments puts Mailum at the conceptual front of the ultra-private category. If, instead, your priorities are market traction, operational maturity, ecosystem breadth and adjacent services, Proton will likely remain the conservative choice. For privacy maximalists, Mailum offers a concrete response to the problem most providers still leave unsolved: what metadata reveals.
Quick-Start Guide to Mailum
- Sign-Up and Keys: create your account (there’s a free tier; paid plans are inexpensive) and save the “Secret Token.” Without it, you may recover the address but not the historical messages (that’s the zero-access design at work).
- Turn on 2FA with an OTP app (Google Authenticator, Authy). It hardens access without handing a recovery backdoor to the provider.
- Use Tor when it matters: access via the verified
.onionlink to conceal both your content and your destination.http://mailum3h3jwoeptq7p6wxoigqvc4m25kujxfybu7mud3uxkmebnphmad.onion - Payments: if you opt for a plan, consider paying with cryptocurrency if your goal is to minimize traceability; independent reviewers confirm broad crypto support through a reputable processor.
Epilogue
The recent history of encrypted email teaches a simple lesson: standards move forward when someone makes the norm uncomfortable. Proton turned end-to-end encryption into an expectation. Mailum, with its push to encrypt what others don’t and to offer first-class Tor entry, is stretching a different frontier. In a year defined by the mass harvesting of metadata, that emphasis isn’t cosmetic; it’s a design politics.
The provisional verdict is clear: if your priority is to hide both the message and the context of the message, Mailum behaves like the new inbox of the discreet—a service that understands that, in 2025, privacy isn’t an accessory; it’s the architecture of email itself.
Disclaimer
This site is independent and does not receive payments, sponsorships, or donations to recommend, review, or promote third-party services or websites. All information is provided in good faith and stems solely from product use and the trust built within our user community. We do not accept any form of compensation for featuring or promoting sites.
Each user is solely responsible for how they use any mentioned services. This site does not guarantee availability, security, legality, or fitness for a particular purpose and assumes no liability for any losses, damages, or consequences arising from the use—or misuse—of third-party services or the information provided here. Always review the applicable terms, privacy policies, and laws in your jurisdiction before using any service.
Leave a Reply